- From: Paul Libbrecht <paul@activemath.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:56:15 +0100
- To: William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
Le 21 déc. 04, à 18:52, William F Hammond a écrit : > Paul Libbrecht <paul@activemath.org> writes: > >> . . . >> Currently, this is "dirty" MathML which includes html and hence can >> only be viewed in Mozilla, we have, internally, a version that >> displays in MSIE+MathPlayer. . . . > > I don't understand what "dirty" means here. Could you clarify? > For example, do you refer to the use of HTML elements like "em" and > "strong" inside "mtext"? (Is it the case that IE+MathPlayer does not > handle "em" and "strong" inside "mtext"?) Yes, I do refer to them but I don't think they are especially under mtext elements (that could be fixed maybe). I don't think there's a hope to change MathML in order for such a mixed code to be eaten. CSS, among others, is also used (e.g. with span elements) and having a full-fledged css implementation inside MathML implementation is quite a tough requirement. > I, for one, would like to see a short list of HTML elements such as > "em", "strong", "kbd", and "a" written into the content model > of "mtext". I would sort of consider this not so oddly... but the whole of css as well? paul
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2004 21:17:42 UTC