From: Roger I Martin PhD <hypernexdev@hypernexinc.com>

Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:24:45 -0500

Message-ID: <41B4EA3D.9000909@hypernexinc.com>

To: www-math@w3.org

Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:24:45 -0500

Message-ID: <41B4EA3D.9000909@hypernexinc.com>

To: www-math@w3.org

Hi, I'm writing xslt transforms that take mathml and generates Java code http://sourceforge.net/projects/mathml-x/ during run time binding. One of the difficulties I face is decide how to treat a subscript wrt to it's context. Sometimes there is a different meaning to the subscript: <ci type="double"> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </ci> is an array of doubles, other times it could be a more stylish mathematical grouping of symbols and function as a single variable. Is there some distinction that I am overlooking or is it possible to have more types defined for example: <ci type="double-array"> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </ci> let's it be known that the i(or the second child of msub) is really an index; not a part of stylish |semantics? Have a good day, Roger |Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2004 10:32:00 UTC

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1
: Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:36 UTC
*