W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > July 2003

type='relation' (Re: help: ci type='fn', plus)

From: Andreas Strotmann <Strotmann@rrz.uni-koeln.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 15:02:52 +0200
Message-ID: <3F212A7C.3030807@rrz.uni-koeln.de>
To: Stan Devitt <jsdevitt@stratumtek.com>
CC: www-math@w3.org


this should apply to 'reln' / 'relation' instead of 'fn' / 'function' as 

 -- Andreas

Stan Devitt wrote:

> A number of examples in the current draft make use of type="fn".
> All these should be read as  type="function".  But note that
> type="fn" remains perfectly legal since any CDATA string
> can be a type value.   Apart from this there is no need to
> change these examples.
> Romeo Anghelache wrote:
> Hello,
>> I am a bit confused on the following issues and need some help:
>> 1. Section (apply) paragraph #4 states "if the object being 
>> applied is not already one of the elements known...it is treated as 
>> if it were the content of an fn element"; but fn is deprecated in 
>> favor of csymbol; then
>> writing f(x) as
>> <apply>
>> <ci type="fn">f</ci>...
>> is deprecated too, in my understanding (this example, <ci type="fn"> 
>> appears in a lot of places in the current spec)
>> then what should one write, instead,
>> <apply>
>> <csymbol>f</csymbol> ?
>> (If yes, then also the quoted phrase should be modified accordingly.)
Received on Friday, 25 July 2003 09:03:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:34 UTC