From: Stan Devitt <jsdevitt@stratumtek.com>

Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:58:56 -0400

Message-ID: <3F19CD30.6080705@stratumtek.com>

To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>

CC: www-math@w3.org

Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:58:56 -0400

Message-ID: <3F19CD30.6080705@stratumtek.com>

To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>

CC: www-math@w3.org

This type of set constructor should have a final argument which is a sample of the thing being constructed as in <set> <bvar><ci>i</ci></bvar> <bvar><ci>c</ci></bvar> <condition> <apply><eq/> <ci>c</ci> <apply><times/> <ci>i</ci> <cn>2.54</cn> </apply> </apply> </condition> <list><ci>i</ci><ci>c</ci></list> </set> They should be grouped in some way, for example, using a set, list or vector. Stan Devitt StratumTek Roger L. Costello wrote: >Hi Folks, > >Suppose that I want to represent the set of all inch/centimeter pairs, >e.g, > > {i, c | c = i * 2.54} > >Examples in this set include: > > (1.0, 2.54), (2.0, 5.08), etc > >Is this the correct way to represent this set in MathML: > ><math> > <declare type="set"> > <ci>S<ci> > <set> > <bvar><ci>i</ci></bvar> > <bvar><ci>c</ci></bvar> > <condition> > <apply> > <eq/> > <ci>c</ci> > <apply> > <times/> > <ci>i</ci> > <cn>2.54</cn> > </apply> > </apply> > </condition> > </set> > </declare> ></math> > >I think that this is correct. My only hesitation is that perhaps I need >parentheses around (i,c)? e.g., > > {(i, c) | c = i * 2.54} > >And likewise in the MathML representation place parentheses? /Roger > > >Received on Saturday, 19 July 2003 18:56:53 UTC

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1
: Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:34 UTC
*