W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > July 2003

Re: Last Call Working Draft of MathML 2.0, 2nd edition published

From: Clare So <clare@scl.csd.uwo.ca>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:23:15 -0400
To: Stan Devitt <jsdevitt@stratumtek.com>
Cc: www-math@w3.org
Message-ID: <20030701172315.A26886@ptibonum.scl.csd.uwo.ca>


Thanks for your response.

Well, Bill Naylor had suggested that one can write new OpenMath 
Content Dictionaries if more type information is needed to represent
(see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-math/2003May/0028.html).
By reading the responses, including your response to Andreas, I 
am convinced that there is no need to change this feature of MathML.

Clare So
Student Assistant
Ontario Research Centre for Computer Algebra (ORCCA)

* Stan Devitt <jsdevitt@stratumtek.com> [2003-06-30 21:13]:
>  Clare,
>  Regarding the issue of going to a fixed list of
>  types:
>  Please see my response to Andreas (just sent)
>  in which I discuss the possible values of the
>  type attribute.  In the end, it boils down to a
>  strong need for the flexibility of extensions, and
>  the fact that just the presence of the attribute
>  tells the applications to be careful.  Thus
>  we are not planning on changing this feature.
>  Can I ask you to acknowledge this response
>  this message to help us in tracking responses
>  to the issues that have been raised.
>  Thanks,
>  Stan Devitt
>  Math Working Group
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 17:23:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:34 UTC