W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Last Call Working Draft of MathML 2.0, 2nd edition published

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:29:45 +0100
Message-Id: <200304171029.LAA09590@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: Bill.Naylor@mcs.vuw.ac.nz
CC: www-math@w3.org


Thank you for your comment.


  this is ambiguous as it stands, since that CD holds definitions of six
  symbols. The example would be more accurately (unambiguously) stated as:

I think that the existing examples are technically correct (The
semantics of definitionURL are sufficiently flexible to allow a single
URI to cover different symbol definitions) however it would be clearer
if they were separated.

You suggested


Which is the form used already in some of the OM -> MathML conversion
scripts, however openmath.org serves .ocd files as text/plain so that
you get a "source view", and the browser doesn't scroll to the
definition of N if you follow that link.

We propose to use


without any explict extension as an abstract identifier for this symbol.
The server at openmath.org (now!) will redirect that to the html form


where the fragment identifier #N will work as expected and scroll the
view to the symbol N.

I hope this is acceptable. As this is a "last call" comment, please
acknowledge on the list if it is (or isn't) as we need to record the
resolution of all comments as part of the process of moving the document
on to the next stage.

Thanks again for your careful review,


This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2003 06:30:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:33 UTC