Re: w3c-libwww-5.2.8-7 bug report

>     Ignore them all.  The first three are dubious.  The spec is somewhat
> ambiguous (5.16 Stroustrop), but the definite intent is to replicate the
> behavior of an if..else clause.  If start is zero, it would take a very
> perverse compiler to increment it in this instance.  And you're probably
> not
> using gopher.

 I don't think it's the problem. If start is not zero, the statement
equals to "start = ++start;" which is in fact undefined in C.

    -JCT-

Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2002 04:20:35 UTC