W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-lib@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: HTLocal bug?

From: Kinuko Yasuda <kinuko@tom.sfc.keio.ac.jp>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 01:18:42 +0900
To: jose.kahan@w3.org
Cc: www-lib@w3.org
Message-Id: <20000617011842K.kinuko@tom.sfc.keio.ac.jp>

Hello Jose, 

In message Re: HTLocal bug?
      jose.kahan@w3.org wrote:

> > diff -bw HTFile.c.orig HTFile.c
> > 439c439
> > < 		if (HTHost_addNet(host, net) == HT_PENDING)
> > ---
> > > 		if (HTHost_addNet(host, net) == HT_PENDING) {
> > 440a441,442
> > >                     return HT_OK;
> > >                 }
> 
> Is there any reason why you are (were) returning HT_OK instead of HT_PENDING?


Let me remind...the reason was, probably I just followed the way
of HT_Cache. In HT_Cache, it returns HT_OK in a similar situation.

Also I noticed that almost all of other HT???Event callbacks return 
only HT_OK or sometimes HT_ERROR, and the return values of them seem
to be rarely used. (It is sometimes very confusing, because a few code
assumes the return values are meaningful, while some callbacks don't
make them so.)

> I just made a change in HTFile.c to return HT_PENDING. It seems to be working.

I agree with you. It will make the situation clearer.
(Also I think that modifying HT_Cache.c similarly would be better.)

> I'll commit it to the base. 
> Can you give it a try to see if it is working with your code?

Sure I can.

Thank you for your time for maintainance the libwww.
I'm looking forward to the new version of libwww.
--
kinuko
Received on Friday, 16 June 2000 12:18:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:18:36 GMT