Re: libwww and autoconf (fwd)

jose.kahan@w3.org wrote:
> 
> was it a crucial issue to use the lastest autoconf (2.13) in the CVS
> version of libwww ? I reckon that keeping up to date is fine, but the main
> installed base of linux distributions still use version 2.12 (and no, not
> everyone use RedHat 6).

Yes, it was in fact necessary as we use features in the latest automake
and that requires the latest autoconf.

--
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen,
World Wide Web Consortium
http://www.w3.org/People/Frystyk

Received on Tuesday, 8 June 1999 13:49:45 UTC