W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-lib@w3.org > October to December 1998

RE: Scheduling libwww release (was Lots of important fixes comm itted to libwww - please try them out!)

From: Vladimir Kozlov <Vladimir.Kozlov@idm.ru>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 20:58:15 +0300
Message-ID: <6174667DA154D211BA2D00A0C9292CCB35A9@E0-IDM.r.miee.ru>
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
Cc: www-lib@w3.org
It sounds brilliant!

As far as I found it's OK (in Wintel, to be honest...). Now the new
installation of the Wintel libwww is ready: see
http://194.226.9.94/libwww.htm for details. I've just update from
repository. If there will be any difficulties/changes/suggestions just
let me know... :-)

Kind regards,

Vladimir.

-----Original Message-----
From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen [mailto:frystyk@w3.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 1998 7:39 PM
To: Linus.Walleij@ecs.ericsson.se; www-lib@w3.org
Subject: Scheduling libwww release (was Lots of important fixes
committed to libwww - please try them out!)


At 15:46 10/20/98 +0200, Linus.Walleij@ecs.ericsson.se wrote:
>Hm, isn't it soon about time to do a complete RELEASE of the libwww
package,
>or does everybody use the CVS constructed tarfile nowadays?

Good question,

I have actually been thinking about the same thing which was why I
wanted
to get these fixes in.

Also note, that Bob Racko, John Punin, Jose Kahan, and Vladimir Kozlov
are
all working on some really cool things: improving the robot, digest
authentication, and install shields for windows to mention a few. These
guys are doing truly good work!

I think the best way to proceed is for people on this list to test out
the
current code base and make sure it works as intended or propose fixes
for
any problems. The more help we get the faster this can be done.

At the same time, hopefully the new can be added as they get ready.

Does this sound like a plan?

Henrik
--
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen,
World Wide Web Consortium
http://www.w3.org/People/Frystyk
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 1998 12:58:17 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 17:59:19 EDT