Re: I found something!

Maybe you can take the value specified using the request timeout property.

Wolfgang


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
An: Wolfgang Platzer <wplatzer@iaik.tu-graz.ac.at>
Cc: Jigsaw Mailinglist <www-jigsaw@w3.org>
Datum: Dienstag, 24. Februar 1998 09:51
Betreff: Re: I found something!


>On Fri, 20 Feb 1998, Wolfgang Platzer wrote:
>
>> I don't know if it was your intension, but you solved this problem in
>> Jigsaw1.0beta2. You added some debugging code to method bind in class
>> SocketClient:
>>
>>  try {
>>      socket.setSoTimeout(300000); // FIXME for debugging only
>>  } catch (SocketException ex) {
>>      ex.printStackTrace();
>>  }
>
>It was for debugging as it shown that it was a blocked socket, I still
>think that it is a decent hack (more or less) and the improvement would be
>to set this timeout using a property instead of this hardwired value...
>The main work is now to port all the remaining resources to the new
>frame-model, but it is in the todo list :)
>
>      /\          - Yves Lafon - World Wide Web Consortium -
>  /\ /  \                Architecture Domain - Jigsaw
> /  \    \/\
>/    \   /  \   http://www.w3.org/People/Lafon - ylafon@w3.org
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 24 February 1998 05:19:01 UTC