W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-jigsaw@w3.org > May to June 1997

Re: w3c.www.protocol.http.Request

From: Maria ANGI/HCM/97S <e_mangi@utila.ifi.uni-klu.ac.at>
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 19:21:45 +0200
Message-Id: <199705291721.TAA12615@ischia.ifi.uni-klu.ac.at>
To: www-jigsaw@w3.org
 
> Maria ANGI writes:
>  > Hi!
>  > 
>  > 
>  > I have subclassed the HttpManager class.
>  > Now I have problems with the w3c.www.protocol.http.Request and Reply classes.
>  > It would be fine if they could have at least a protected constructor.
>  > 
> 
> I was rethinking about your query. I would be really interested to
> know (if possible) what kind of extensions you are writting, in
> particular couldn't that be done with filters ?
> 
> Anselm.
> 

What I am doing is implementing a caching hierarchy. It is not based on the 
ICP protocol.
So for example, I need to send a "HEAD" request to query the upper cache
for some informations and depending on these informations to send "GET" request.
I've wanted to use the HttpServer.runRequest(Request) method more times.

If I would implement this through a filter it would be more complecated
and again I would need to instantiate a Request object(which is impossible
now because it hasn't accessable constructor). Of course I could make 
my own "myRequest" class with the same implementation like Request and
using it to emit requests. But it's not fine.


Angi Maria
Received on Thursday, 29 May 1997 13:20:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 9 April 2012 12:13:26 GMT