W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: I18N-ISSUE-234: Author vs implementer guidelines [unicode-xml]

From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:23:19 +0900
Message-ID: <50FA6607.8030500@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
To: Internationalization Working Group <www-international@w3.org>
CC: Internationalization Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
On 2013/01/19 2:30, Internationalization Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> I18N-ISSUE-234: Author vs implementer guidelines [unicode-xml]
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/234
>
> Raised by: Richard Ishida
> On product: unicode-xml
>
> Many of the recommendations in the document are for content authors. Others are for browser or editing tool implementers. It would be useful to highlight which is which.

What kind of highlight do you imagine? We did quite a bit of that in 
Charmod, but this document isn't a Rec.

Regards,   Martin.
Received on Saturday, 19 January 2013 09:23:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 19 January 2013 09:23:58 GMT