W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: New issue ZWNJ-ZWJ-111

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:56:18 +0900
Message-ID: <4688E7E2.5020302@w3.org>
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
CC: "www-international@w3.org" <www-international@w3.org>, public-iri@w3.org

Martin Duerst wrote:
> I have listed this as http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/#ZWNJ-ZWJ-111.
>
> Regards,   Martin.
>
> At 10:54 05/08/17, Martin Duerst wrote:
>   
>> The IRI spec doesn't say anything about ZWJ/ZWNJ, and so
>> it can be said to be "at least not wrong". IRIs, except
>> for transcoding issues from legacy encodings and those
>> parts that are case-insensitive, are always compared
>> codepoint by codepoint. I guess Unicode should fix their
>> text about ZWJ/ZWNJ, but there is nothing in the IRI
>> spec (as far as I see) that needs fixing for this issue.
>>     

I agree with your explanation, Martin. Thank you & regards,

Felix

>> Regards,    Martin.
>>
>> At 17:32 05/08/16, Felix Sasaki wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This came up at the unicode list. I'm not sure if is an issue for IRI /
>>> the future development of the IRI spec, but I'm bringing it to the
>>> attention of www-international and public-iri. Any comments? 
>>>       
>
>
> #-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
> #-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     
>
>
>   
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 11:56:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:14 GMT