W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: IRI with compatibility character, unwise?

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:45:19 +0900
Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20051005134407.05dc1880@localhost>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
Cc: www-international@w3.org

At 22:14 05/10/04, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
 >
 >
 >Thanks to all; comments have been helpful.
 >
 >In response to Martin's question about change to Jena ...
 >
 >We are currently thinking about doing a rather better job of IRI support 
than we have at the moment; it is not yet specified, but would minimally:
 >- be based on RFC 3987 (and 3986)
 >- also support the 'legacy' concept of RDF URI Reference, but warn when a 
non-IRI, RDF URI Reference occurs.
 >
 >It would be best if it could offer the sort of analysis that went into 
this support request.
 >
 >I think from our point of view there are some clear advantages to IRIs.
 >Is there an off-the-shelf open source Java package that does say the 
equivalent of java.net.URI with the various IRI nuances.

Not that I know. But I'll have somebody here check it out.

Regards,   Martin. 
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 08:13:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:06 GMT