W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > April to June 2005

RE: New tutorial for REVIEW: Ruby Markup and Styling

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:46:49 +0100
To: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: <www-international@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20050627134649.E62D04F125@homer.w3.org>

Hi Dan,

see below...

============
Richard Ishida
W3C

contact info:
http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ 

W3C Internationalization:
http://www.w3.org/International/ 

Publication blog:
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@w3.org] 
> Sent: 27 June 2005 13:18
> To: Richard Ishida
> Cc: www-international@w3.org
> Subject: Re: New tutorial for REVIEW: Ruby Markup and Styling
> 
> Richard Ishida wrote:
> 
> >http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/ruby/
> >
> >Comments are being sought on this tutorial prior to final 
> release. Please send any comments to www-international@w3.org.
> >  
> >
> 
> [[
> Ruby annotation markup is not valid in HTML 4 or XHTML 1.0 documents.
> However, the specification is one of the modules that make up 
> XHTML 1.1.
> It is also expected to be one of the modules in XHTML 2.0, 
> which is in development.
> ]]
> 
> I understand that XHTML 2.0's Last Call is "imminent" (from 
> conversations with Steven re the RDF/A metadata work). If 
> that's the case, could the tutorial perhaps offer a few more 
> words on the state of Ruby in XHTML 2.0?

The ruby content in the XHTML 2.0 spec is simply a link to the Ruby Annotation recommendation, so I don't think there's much more to say on the matter.  Would it help to say that, though?  (I didn't want to do much more than hint at its availability in XHTML 2 until that spec at least gets to CR, though. Things can still change.)

> 
> BTW I'm interested to learn more about how to use Ruby in 
> (X)HTML markup fragments inside RDF/XML (eg. RSS1.0, FOAF, 
> Creative Commons, ...), but I guess I should be studying the 
> spec itself for that. Is there anything more I should do 
> there than use an XHTML namespace within an RDF XML Literal 
> construct? I think I need to learn more about XHTML modules 
> to understand this.

Yes, I'm not sure about it either, however it's on the radar for inclusion in the output of the ITS (Internationalized Tag Set) WG, so I guess I'll know more soon.  
http://esw.w3.org/topic/its0506ReqRuby

RI

> 
> Anyway, thanks for a handy looking tutorial :)

Thank you!

> 
> Dan
> 
Received on Monday, 27 June 2005 13:46:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:05 GMT