W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-i18n-comments@w3.org > September 2006

Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Missing document reference

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:29:28 -0600
To: "'Richard Ishida'" <ishida@w3.org>
Message-ID: <008801c6d5bf$74719b30$9b05a8c0@Breizh>

Hello Richard, all

This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group.
See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0018.html for our discussion.

Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement it. Please have a look at:
http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#introduction

Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear from you, we will assume this issue as closed.

Regards,
-yves


The original comments and discussion are here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0018.html
> Subject: RE: missing doc ref
> 
> I think that we *should* mention it in the introductory text 
> somewhere, since it is a document that people are familiar 
> with, and it ties together the ITS work with initiatives 
> associated with that document, and shows that this is a 
> practical outcome of those ideas, which I believe is useful.
> (Note, for example, that the DITA folks were working from 
> that document, rather than from ITS stuff initially.)
> 
> (Which has set me also to thinking that maybe we should refer 
> to it in the ITS spec, too, for the same reasons - since very 
> few people are likely to read the Requirements document once 
> the spec is out.)
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 16:29:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:32:36 GMT