Are you saying that both might be W3C Recommendations? Should we not only have one standard to show web pages on the web? Isn't it the reason for a standard? 2009/1/5 Peter Krantz <peter.krantz@gmail.com> > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 17:25, Molte <molte93@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > But as I said, I still believe it is stupid to develop them both when > only > > one of them is going to be used; > > I am not sure only one of them will be used. XHTML 2 is a generic > document language which may become a foundation for document-centric > apps that need an unambiguous way to include domain-specific data (via > RDFa). You may not see a lot of it on the open web, but it may well be > used a lot in specific technology domains. > > So, maybe there will be a place for both? > > Regards, > > Peter > -- Molte CosSinCalc http://cossincalc.comReceived on Monday, 5 January 2009 17:43:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:40 GMT