On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Luca Passani wrote: > > Tina Holmboe wrote: >> >> In addition it is likely that UAs will continue to support style; nay, >> it is certain that they will for backwards compatibility reasons. >> >> The question whether we should remove it from a /new/ standard doesn't >> have much of an impact on whether UAs will remove it from something >> already established. > "W3C can do pretty much what they want, since it's irrelevant and > browser manufacturers > Is this what you mean? No. I mean that simply because we release a NEW standard the UA writers won't remove support for OLD standards. That's what I wrote, and that's what it meant. Unless what you want to do today /doesn't work/, then it would seem that the standard you /are/ using fill your purpose, and this discussion has really lost its point. And, frankly, from the abrasive manner you exhibit I have no further interest in the topic until and unless it ends up on the XHTML WG table for serious consideration. -- - Tina Holmboe siteSifter Greytower Technologies http://www.sitesifter.co.uk http://www.greytower.net Website Quality and Accessibility TestingReceived on Wednesday, 25 June 2008 19:19:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:38 GMT