I do not necessarily want to warm up the old discussion [1] that wondered about the content model of the “title” element (not allowing any elements within) but instead ask why “title” needed to be an element at all – wouldn't it have been sufficient as “html@title” as well? Just out of curiosity and due to the fact that apparently, “title”'s content model will or can not be changed anymore. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2007Feb/0002.html -- Jens Meiert http://meiert.com/en/Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 14:53:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 07:54:38 GMT