Anas R. wrote: > But regarding backwards compatibility, I've post another syntax: > > <label>Gender:</label> <input name="gender" value="male" type="radio">Male</input> > <input name="gender" value="female" type="radio">Female</input> > > Which is backwards compatible. What do you base this statement on? It clearly isn't since current user agents that associate labels with fields using LABEL and implicit nesting, or, more reliably, FOR and ID, and labels with fieldsets using LEGEND and FIELDSET, cannot reliably associate "Gender" with its radio button set, or "Male" with its input or "Female" with its input. "Looking okay" is not the same as being backwards compatible. -- Benjamin Hawkes-LewisReceived on Monday, 28 April 2008 16:36:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:36 GMT