W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > April 2008

Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:30:11 +0100
Message-ID: <47F37C53.3010706@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

Tina Holmboe wrote:

> 
>   My argument apply to the generic case, which I got the impression
>   you argued against.


I was saying that, before you can make a use case, you need to provide 
an example where:

1) the use of OL is the correct markup;

2) having an Hn within a list item is reasonable.

I believe the current concrete case fails on point (1).

There may be cases that pass on case (2), but I think a concrete example 
of one needs to be found before one goes any further.


-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 12:30:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:13 GMT