Laura Carlson wrote: > Is there a rationale document that provides evidence [1] for the HTML > 5 spec (previously WHAT WG's proposal) that is up for review for the > HTML WG? > > Reasoning for what is currently included may help provide some insight > to WG members and other interested parties. Not in one nice place, unfortunately. You can search the WHATWG mailing list archives [1] if you like. But we are about to begin the review process for the spec, where we will be going through and documenting arguments for and against each feature. There's a discussion going on in IRC right now to determine the best way to track and document the issues. [1] http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/ -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/Received on Monday, 14 May 2007 18:37:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 07:54:37 GMT