W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Moving on

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:22:39 +0900
Message-Id: <5A6D68D6-03CB-4C5E-BC80-D0A9F154DA2F@w3.org>
Cc: Philip & Le Khanh <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>, www-html@w3.org, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>


Le 7 mai 2007 à 21:17, Sam Ruby a écrit :
> Philip & Le Khanh wrote:
>> 1) Do you agree that HTML 5 should include all the elements
>>    and attributes currently allowed in HTML 4.01 Strict ?
>
> An alternative phrasing which will likely get quite different results:
>
> 1) Do you believe that HTML 5 conformance checkers should flag as
>    an error commonly used tags which are widely supported and pose
>    no interoperability issues?

Which leads to another questions.

How do we know it is supported?
How well supported?
In which class of products?

Ex: What does that mean to support blockquote?



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 03:23:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:10 GMT