Le 7 mai 2007 à 21:17, Sam Ruby a écrit : > Philip & Le Khanh wrote: >> 1) Do you agree that HTML 5 should include all the elements >> and attributes currently allowed in HTML 4.01 Strict ? > > An alternative phrasing which will likely get quite different results: > > 1) Do you believe that HTML 5 conformance checkers should flag as > an error commonly used tags which are widely supported and pose > no interoperability issues? Which leads to another questions. How do we know it is supported? How well supported? In which class of products? Ex: What does that mean to support blockquote? -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 03:23:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:43 GMT