- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 00:34:24 +0100
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- CC: www-html@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > > Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: > >>>> If AT had better support for CSS, and CSS had style selectors, we'd >>>> be in a slightly happier place: > > [...] > >> Alternatively, one could require UAs to ignore self-contradictory >> property declarations used with style selectors. > > Rather than make the language more unambiguous, you're placing a lot of > the burden of understanding what the heck the author actually meant in > the hands of UAs and AT... > > Yeah, let authors author however they like...let the browser and screen > reader work it out. While we're at it, we can drop h1-h6, as there's > plenty of authors out the who just use bold paragraphs anyway... I'm confused. What I'm suggesting has /nothing/ to do with what the author actually meant: it's purely presentational. -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Sunday, 6 May 2007 23:34:34 UTC