Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: >>> If AT had better support for CSS, and CSS had style selectors, we'd >>> be in a slightly happier place: [...] > Alternatively, one could require UAs to ignore self-contradictory > property declarations used with style selectors. Rather than make the language more unambiguous, you're placing a lot of the burden of understanding what the heck the author actually meant in the hands of UAs and AT... Yeah, let authors author however they like...let the browser and screen reader work it out. While we're at it, we can drop h1-h6, as there's plenty of authors out the who just use bold paragraphs anyway... P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com ______________________________________________________________ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________ Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team http://streetteam.webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________Received on Sunday, 6 May 2007 23:10:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:34 GMT