W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > January 2007

Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag

From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 01:42:06 +0100
Message-Id: <26615E4A-4DE8-4600-83DD-C72EA13FDCA0@empyree.org>
Cc: HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, www-html-editor@w3.org


Le 25 sept. 06 à 15:00, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :

> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:54:30 +0200, David Latapie  
> <david@empyree.org> wrote:
>> -- <em role="0">    default
>> -- <em role="+1">   equivalent to em
>> -- <em role="+2">   equivalent to strong
>> -- <em role="-1">   less important, may be rendered as font- 
>> size:smaller
>
> This proposal doesn't cover nesting.

Do you mean emphasis inside an emphasis? I suggest *addition*

“Animals (for instance dogs, like _mine_) do it”


XHTML 2.0         “Animals (<em role="-1">for instance dogs, like <em  
role="+1">mine</em>)</em> do it”
                       0                
-1                                    +1=0                 0
CSS voice-stress |--none-|------------- 
reduced------------------|---------none-----------|-----none---|

(there may also be a final gap at the end of de-emphasis, but this is  
not related to nesting, this is just an extra thought)

Please tell me if answsers shall not be forwarded to editor, only  
initial proposals.

-- 
</david_latapie>
http://blog.empyree.org/   U+0F00
Received on Saturday, 20 January 2007 00:42:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:08 GMT