W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > September 2006

tags vs elements (was: Re: [ot] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:47:59 +0200
To: "David Latapie" <david@empyree.org>
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tgfx59je64w2qv@id-c0020>

On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:23:55 +0200, David Latapie <david@empyree.org>  
wrote:
> I'm talking about "<em> and <strong>" (not about <em>Some text</em> and  
> <strong>Some text</strong>). So tag is the right word. But thank you for  
> pointing out Anne's article, it is very useful.

No it isn't. I guess I should update my article. Moving this thread to  
www-html as www-html-editor is clearly not the right list.

Tags are only relevant if you're discussing source code or authoring  
requirements. If you're explicitly talking about the "<p> element start  
tag" or something. Otherwise you should just refer to them as elements. As  
in: "The <i> element indicates italics."


(Using < and > for lack of markup in e-mails...)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 15:48:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:07 GMT