W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > October 2006

Re: XHTML 2 current WD makes achieving WCAG 1.0-A compliance impossible; a proof

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:21:46 +0200
To: mark.birbeck@x-port.net
Cc: www-html@w3.org, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.tha26kqcsmjzpq@acer3010.lan>

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:44:31 +0200, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>  
> I'm worried that you are worried! :)

That's a relief then!

> However, that was only one of Cecil's points. The other was the use of
> @title on <link>, and my point is simply that, although our rules
> indicate that this is possible:
>   <link rel="meta" href="OurICRAPolicy.rdf">
>     <meta property="title">ICRA</meta>
>   </link>
> there has been some discussion over on RDFa about changing the meaning
> of this.

Ah, I see. In other words, for the case of <link>. So you still agree that  
this is OK:

		<meta property="title">Not pain but <em xml:lang="fr">pain</em></meta>

> I'm therefore saying that Cecil's post is a very useful
> reminder of why we need to ensure that the mark-up I've just used
> yields the correct triples to support his use-case.

Agreed. It would be unfortunate if it worked for some elements, and not  

Fears allayed.


Received on Thursday, 12 October 2006 11:22:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:14 UTC