>>> in HTML _and_ XHTML you can change the DOM by adding content via DOM >>> methods. And you may need a noscript alternative then. So the need >>> for noscript is not a difference between HTML and XHTML. >> >> No. With the DOM method, the whole document is the noscript content. >> You don't need an element to identify it, you can modify it at will. > > I think, whether you need an alternative (noscript) for the scripting > depends on what is done in the script. If essential functionality is > added via scripting, a noscript alternative _is_ needed. ? why? in your html is the content *without* javascript with all essential functionality. if javascript is active, you can hide, change or whatever this with your script. so? frank -- frank hellenkamp | interface designer jonas.info@gmx.net | mail +49.30.49 78 20 70 | tel +49.173.70 55 781 | mbl +49.12120.243 912 | faxReceived on Monday, 24 July 2006 20:21:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 07:54:33 GMT