W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > July 2006

Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript

From: Frank Hellenkamp <jonas.info@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:21:18 +0200
Message-ID: <44C52BBE.1090902@gmx.net>
To: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
CC: www-html@w3.org
>>> in HTML _and_ XHTML you can change the DOM by adding content via DOM 
>>> methods. And you may need a noscript alternative then. So the need
>>> for  noscript is not a difference between HTML and XHTML.
>>
>> No. With the DOM method, the whole document is the noscript content.
>> You  don't need an element to identify it, you can modify it at will.
> 
> I think, whether you need an alternative (noscript) for the scripting
> depends on what is done in the script. If essential functionality is
> added via scripting, a noscript alternative _is_ needed.

?

why?
in your html is the content *without* javascript with all essential
functionality.
if javascript is active, you can hide, change or whatever this with your
script.

so?


frank

-- 
frank hellenkamp | interface designer
jonas.info@gmx.net | mail
+49.30.49 78 20 70 | tel
+49.173.70 55 781 | mbl
+49.12120.243 912 | fax



Received on Monday, 24 July 2006 20:21:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:07 GMT