W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > July 2006

Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript

From: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:24:30 +0200
Message-ID: <44C5024E.9080602@w3development.de>
To: www-html@w3.org

Steven Pemberton wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:57:40 +0200, Johannes Koch 
> <koch@w3development.de>  wrote:
>> in HTML _and_ XHTML you can change the DOM by adding content via DOM  
>> methods. And you may need a noscript alternative then. So the need 
>> for  noscript is not a difference between HTML and XHTML.
> No. With the DOM method, the whole document is the noscript content. 
> You  don't need an element to identify it, you can modify it at will.

I think, whether you need an alternative (noscript) for the scripting 
depends on what is done in the script. If essential functionality is 
added via scripting, a noscript alternative _is_ needed.
Johannes Koch
Spem in alium nunquam habui praeter in te, Deus Israel.
                          (Thomas Tallis, 40-part motet)
Received on Monday, 24 July 2006 17:25:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:13 UTC