- From: Spartanicus <spartanicus.3@ntlworld.ie>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:59:38 +0000
- To: www-html@w3.org
VK <schools_ring@yahoo.com> wrote: ><OBJECT> replacement did not work out because of too many >security implications. There are no "security" differences between HTML embedded via the <iframe> and the <object> element. The fact that a popular OS component that pretends to be a web browser requires a particular "ActiveX" setting to be enabled before it will render HTML embedded with the <object> element is just another illustration of the silly behaviour of that particular software. -- Spartanicus (email whitelist in use, non list-server mail will not be seen)
Received on Friday, 10 February 2006 10:59:01 UTC