W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > August 2006

Re: samp, kbd, var

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:13:37 +0100
Message-ID: <44EB7381.10307@splintered.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

David Woolley wrote:

> There are other XML applications that are targetted at that market.
> HTML was intended as something that you could teach to secretaries,
> librarians, anyone who could understand the basic grammar of their
> native language, etc.

Which still doesn't answer the thread starter: why are samp, kbd and var 
specifically still in this basic grammar, when they only refer to 
specialised types of content in a particular field?

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 22 August 2006 21:13:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:07 GMT