W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > November 2005

Re: [Structure Module] Renaming the <html> element to more semantic name

From: (wrong string) Кудабуло <chernovik@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:58:45 +0300
Message-ID: <42a259d60511140458u22693f86y862e2f7965a5fdf7@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-html@w3.org

On 11/14/05, sjoerd@w3future.com <sjoerd@w3future.com> wrote:
>
>
> > <section>
> >   <section id="first">
> >     <link rel="stylesheet" href="somestyles.css" type="text/css"/>
> >     <!-- content -->
> >   </section>
> >   <section id="second">
> >     <link rel="stylesheet" href="morestyles.css" type="text/css"/>
> >     <!-- content -->
> >   </section>
> > </section>
>
>
> > A better example:
> > <section>
> >   <section id="first">
> >     <link rel="next" href="freaky.xhtml"/>
> >     <!-- content -->
> >   </section>
> >   <section id="second">
> >     <link rel="next" href="funky.xhtml"/>
> >     <!-- content -->
> >   </section>
> > </section>
>
> Note that these links can already be created with the various linking and
> meta constructions in XHTML 2. So these problems will have to be resolved
> anyway.
>

By the way, I rightly understand, that

<a href="..." rel="next">...</a>
<a href="..." rel="prev">...</a>

is preferable to

<link href="..." rel="next" title="..." .../>
<link href="..." rel="prev" title="..." .../>

is it?
Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 12:59:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:04 GMT