>>> David Håsäther <hasather@gmail.com> 5/26/2005 3:36:08 PM >>> > > I'm not sure I agree using a definition list with only terms, and no > definitions makes sense, though. Can't think of any circumstances where > that would be appropriate, got any examples? How about an incomplete glossary? It could be wiki-based or on an individual page in progress. To say there's no definition--or at least not yet--one could leave the element out entirely. That seems preferable over "<dd/>" to me. - Ed.Received on Thursday, 26 May 2005 19:57:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:38 GMT