W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD

From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 23:02:02 +0200
Message-ID: <4296394A.8030206@students.cs.uu.nl>
To: David Håsäther <hasather@gmail.com>, www-html@w3.org

David Håsäther wrote:
> Also, the content model for di is:
> ( dt+, dd*)
> This means that no definition data is required. Unless there is a 
> specific reason for this, it should be changed to:
> (dt, dd)+

I think (hope) this is intentional. This is also the case in HTML 4.

A use scenario is a document documenting a list of attribute values for
an element, where not all attribute values have been documented yet.

This is an actual case in the reference documentation of my company’s 


Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2005 21:02:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:10 UTC