W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > May 2005

Re: About XHTML 2.0

From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 12:15:53 -0400
Message-ID: <abd6c80105052309155e7b2d69@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-html@w3.org

Even so, I'd like to avoid any grouping structures that add additional
depth that would interfere with xpath and CSS selectors. Can you show
how to simply get around this issue in XML compliant way?

Orion Adrian

On 5/23/05, Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl> wrote:
> Orion Adrian wrote:
> > However <seperator /> is very lightweight while <group> or similar is
> > not.  It also doesn't require CSS styling by the author to be useful.
> > There is a web out there that doesn't use CSS at all and it would
> > behoove us to assume it's existence. It also imposes yet another layer
> > of depth which will interfere with child (as opposed to decendant)
> > type selectors in both CSS and XPath.
> 
> I never said CSS was required. The "grouping construct" should of course
> be defined in a similar way to "separator" (spelling issues...).
> 
> 
> --
>   Anne van Kesteren
>   <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
> 
>
Received on Monday, 23 May 2005 16:16:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:19:04 UTC