W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Navigation Lists Lack Adequate Structure and Other Thoughts on Navigation Lists

From: Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 13:11:13 -0400
Message-ID: <428F6BB1.4080504@gmail.com>
To: Maxwell Terpstra <terpstra@myrealbox.com>
CC: www-html@w3.org

Actually, when it comes to nl, I think it would be more useful if it 
were more like a definition list (with both a "term" and "description).  
The description can be optional, but it'd help in situations where the 
user's browser doesn't support CSS, and could even allow for CSS-based 
display of the description when the person hovers over the link.

Something like this:

    <li href="http://www.test.com">Link</link>
    <desc>This is just a test link</desc>

And so on.  This is probably best from an accessibility view, because 
the current proposal doesn't have any good methods of showing extra info 
about a link.

http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ - Get Firefox!
http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ - Reclaim Your Inbox!
Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 17:10:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:10 UTC