On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:34:03 +0000, Nicholas Chase <nchase@earthlink.net> wrote: > Everybody's focusing on the semantics of "nofollow" as a word, but if > you really want to get into it, it IS accurate. Not at all. > This is a link whose relationship with the current content is that it not > related enough that it should be followed. Period. Then why do you even need a 'rel' value? Can't you just write out the URI of the author in plain text, that is, in no elements or tags at all? Or even better; why write out the URI in the first place? Afaik, Google does not follow links that aren't there. That should solve the problem quite nicely. -- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/ «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»Received on Monday, 24 January 2005 04:12:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:01 GMT