- From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:48:42 +0100 (MET)
- To: www-html-editor@w3.org,www-html@w3.org
> > Rather some alternative solution than this attempt, which in my > > opinion should be ignored. > > So world wide implementations should be ignored? [...] This sounds like "if all do this, it is good", which is likely to be counterproductive. Nonetheless, Alexander, Asbjørn, and Lachlan, among others, gave excellent feedback on the entire problem so far. > I do not think the W3C can simply ignore such things [...] In my opinion, if something doesn't make any sense, it /must/ be treated accordingly (for example, ignored), and one /could/ start to look for alternatives. Nonetheless, what about 'rel="unrelated"'? It could "complete" existing link types [1] and could also allow for specific handling - if someone links to an "unrelated" resource, Google & Co could interpret it accordingly, by ignoring it, by reducing its importance, whatever. Jens. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#type-links -- Jens Meiert Information Architect http://meiert.com/
Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 09:49:14 UTC