W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > December 2005

Re: <spoiler> element

From: Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:10:43 -0500
Message-ID: <43976BF3.4090103@gmail.com>
To: Oskar Welzl <lists@welzl.info>
CC: Devin Bayer <devin@freeshell.org>, Jeremy Rand <jeremy@asofok.org>, www-html@w3.org

XLink as it is right now would be very bad for XHTML.  I seriously doubt 
page authors will want to have to declare a simple link EVERY SINGLE 
TIME they want to have a link.

Oskar Welzl wrote:

>Shall we try one more "XLink in XHTML 2.0"?
>Count my vote. - But I'm afraid I'm too late. Again. :-(
>  
>
-- 
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ - Get Firefox!
http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ - Reclaim Your Inbox!

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2005 23:10:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:04 GMT