- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:34:47 +0000
- To: www-html@w3.org
Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > The list exists for discussing the development of HTML. > If you need help with practical problems in HTML authoring, > other fora such as news:comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html > are more appropriate. Fair enough, although I felt that my question wasn't so much about "how do I do this" but rather a clarification of existing spec. > In the XHTML 2.0 draft, the formulation is better, but it still refers > to "processing" of the object and the <object> element's content, and it > seems that the meaning of "processing" is still somewhat vague. In which case, getting back to the point of this list: could the situation be clarified in a future draft? And no, I wouldn't say it's a "contrived" situation...it's a real world situation where, for accessibility and interoperability reasons, an author needs to provide alternative content to an object (as per spec) which happens to be in a form (also nothing wrong per spec). Right, off to find a more suitable list then... -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________
Received on Sunday, 4 December 2005 11:34:46 UTC