- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:12:27 -0400
- To: www-html@w3.org
David Woolley wrote: >> (It is also dropped from CSS >>2.1.) > > > For those unfamiliar with CSS 2.1, having a CSS 2 feature dropped simply > means that there is not a pair of compatible implementations. CSS 2.1 > is not a policy setting document so much as one documenting the status > quo. > > It does reflect the very low priority given to structural markup in > commercial browsers, of course. Failure to get two interoperable > implementation can mean that the specification is techncally flawed, > but quite often means that the feature is not of sufficient commercial > priority. The whole of XHTML 2 is probably not of great commercial > priority, although DI could be rendered as though it were DL and > therefore cheaply supported. <di> could be rendered as though it were <div> and it would be fine. From a CSS renderer's point of view, it's just another block box. ~fantasai -- http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact
Received on Thursday, 16 September 2004 16:08:05 UTC