W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > November 2003

AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type

From: Oskar Welzl <oskar.welzl@pan.at>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 19:50:14 +0100
To: <ernestcline@mindspring.com>, "W3C HTML List" <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c3aae0$23d89aa0$0100a8c0@mshome.net>

> Perhaps I was being too subtle. 

definitely. you should draw large letters with bright coloured crayons when talking to me. ;-)
no, it's only that you spotted the problem earlier than i did.

> The point I tried to obliquely raise in my
> previous post is "Why has type been changed from being 
> descriptive to being
> proscriptive?" 

i'm getting interested in this point, too. the more i think of it, the worse it gets. and it is, of course, exactly the same with the proposed change to hreflang. 

we should not only get hreflang back into XHTML 2 (meaning: hreflang as it was until may 2003), we should probably also make people reconsider @type.

> I see no reason why type should be changed from being advisory as it is in
> HTML4 to being proscriptive as it is in the XHTML2 draft.


Received on Friday, 14 November 2003 13:49:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:06 UTC