I follow very intensively the technical discussions about XHTML2. In times of aggressive nationalism it is good to see, how people around the world cooperate in a rational and creative style in the creation of a new universal (independant of platform, operating-system, ...) language. This language - or a subset of it - could serve in a far future for decoding texts of our culture and civilization now. Perhaps it could sometimes be compared with the famous "stone of Rosette". I think, it was a good idea to create a very new language without considering legacy (HTML, XHTML 1). Therefore it should be defined as clear and simple as possible (but not simpler, citing Einstein). I for myself - as a purist - use strict XHTML, written with emacs and of course verified by W3C. I think I had to post this not technical matter, for considering XHTML 2 in a wide context. Sometimes I had the feeling to be buried in technical details. Good luck Veith Risak University of Salzburg Software Engineering risak@cosy.sbg.ac.atReceived on Sunday, 11 May 2003 15:25:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:55 GMT