W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > May 2003

RE: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft

From: Jelks Cabaniss <jelks@jelks.nu>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 19:05:49 -0400
To: "'Daniel Glazman'" <glazman@netscape.com>, "'Tantek Çelik'" <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001b01c31748$b25c1850$6501a8c0@blackie>

Daniel wrote:

> Sorry, but I still do not like XHTML 2.0. By the way, it __kills__ me
> to see that a W3C WG is releasing a W3C Draft with no XML DTD, based
> on the W3C Rec XML, nor any Schema based on the W3C XML Schema Rec,
> but only a RELAX NG implementation based on an OASIS spec. Is it a
> really **W3C** Working Group ? 

The sample RNG driver in the WD is neat.   Is a W3C Working Group required
to suffer from NIH syndrome?

Received on Saturday, 10 May 2003 19:06:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:03 UTC