On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 08:24:55PM +0100, Herr Christian Wolfgang Hujer wrote: | I'd say, an example of an ideal Accept header for a browser like Konqueror or | Opera (both can handle HTML, XML and XHTML) is: | Accept: | text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/css,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,image/jpeg;q=0.2,*/*;q=0.1 | Which is, of course, just a terse example which should be extended to accept | JavaScript and those types for that plugins were found, like Java, Flash or | SVG. | | What do you think? Hmmm... I'd say it depends on the request. For example, if the request is for a URL typed into the address bar, then what you say above would be appropriate. However, if the request is for an image embedded in a web page, it should send an accept header of something like: Accept: image/png,image/jpeg,image/gif,image/*;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.1 If the request is for something where the browser is already expecting a particular MIME type, for example a link: <link rel="alternative" href="index.foobar" type="foo/bar" title="This page in Foo Bar format"> or an object: <object href="blah.foobar" type="foo/bar"> Alternative content. </object> Then the browser should send: Accept: foo/bar,foo/*;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.1 -- Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS | mailto:tobyink@goddamn.co.uk | pgp:0x6A2A7D39 aim:inka80 | icq:6622880 | yahoo:tobyink | jabber:tobyink@a-message.de http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/ | "You've got spam!" playing://counting_crows/hard_candy_uk_edition/02_american_girls.oggReceived on Sunday, 9 March 2003 14:55:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:19 GMT