W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Horizontal alignment of blocks (was: Ideas for CSS 3.0?)

From: Arthur Wiebe <webmaster@awiebe.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 19:46:44 -0400
Message-ID: <3EDE84E4.6040008@awiebe.com>
To: Mikko Rantalainen <mira@st.jyu.fi>, www-html@w3.org

Is margin made for alignment? Maybe align would be confusing. I have 
thought about it. Since we do have vertical-align why don't we also add 
horizontal-align? It would be more typing but less confusing. Since we 
do have vertical-align it would make sense to also have 
horizontal-align. As far as bloating the browser I don't think 
horizontal-align would do any bloating. Did vertical-align bloat some 
browers?

Mikko Rantalainen wrote:

>
> Arthur Wiebe wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes there has to be a width smaller than the parent in order for it 
>> to be centered. { align: center; width: 60%; } would just be better 
>> than having to use margins. And also align would be easier to 
>> understand. 
>
>
> Well, the user agent would need to map that "align" property to 
> margins anyway or it wouldn't make any sense (think "align: center" 
> combined with "margin-left:0; margin-right: 90%;" What should the user 
> agent do?).
>
> So basically we would create new property "align" with possible values 
> of "left", "right" and "center". And all it would do, is to interpret 
> those as "margin-left: 0; margin-right: auto;", "margin-left: auto; 
> margin-right: 0;" and "margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" 
> respectively. Yes, it would allow shorter style declaration /in some 
> cases/ but in the same time, it would add some bloat to all user agents.
>
> I really think that page authors do need to know the difference 
> between "text-align" and this proposed "align" attributes and if they 
> understand that difference, then using margins for centering instead 
> of this "align" property shouldn't be any problem anyway.
>
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2003 19:46:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:55 GMT