W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > January 2003

Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful

From: Jonas Jørgensen <jonasj@jonasj.dk>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:51:05 +0100
Message-ID: <3E24A269.8060005@jonasj.dk>
To: www-html@w3.org

Toby A Inkster wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:28:11PM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
> | However, wouldn't it be a wise requirement for each new version of 
> | (X)HTML to have at least one compliant implementation _prior_ to the 
> | release?
> 
> How could this be done though? How could a browser maker implement a 
> standard that has not yet been published?

I believe Petr meant prior to moving from Proposed Recommendation to 
Recommendation. (Or from Candidate Recommendation to Recommendation -- I 
always forget which one comes first, and I'm too lazy to check.)

> Besides, as Opera and Mozilla have fairly decent XML+CSS engines, and 
> XHTML is and XML application, you could consider Opera and Mozilla to 
> already support XHTML to a degree.

I consider Opera and Mozilla's XHTML support better than "to a degree".

/Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 18:51:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:54 GMT