W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 2003

Re: Against 'start' and 'value' attributes

From: Toby A Inkster <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 08:07:57 +0000
To: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20030215080756.GB19650@ophelia.goddamn.co.uk>
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:00:00PM +0700, Etan Wexler wrote:
| The typical argument for the 'value' attribute states that the
| list numbering is an essential part of the content and is not
| merely style. 

It sometimes *can* be an essential part of the content. For example, say I 
create an HTML version of the GNU General Public Licence (you should be 
able to find a copy somewhere at http://www.gnu.org/) numbering the legal
clauses using an ordered list.

You'll notice that in the GPL, the first clause is numbered "0", the 
second "1" and so forth. If I acheive this numbering merely using style 
sheets, then a user agent that doesn't support style sheets will number 
them from "1" onwards.

Later, on the same page, I am writing a criticism of the GPL and refer to 
"clause 1". Somebody using a user agent that supports style sheets will 
see which clause I am referring to correctly. Somebody using a user agent 
that doesn't support style sheets will think I am referring to clause 0.

You see, sometimes numbering ordered lists can be too important to leave 
to style sheets. The numbering can form a part of the content.

Of course, other times numbering can happily be left to style sheets, as 
it isn't important to the content.

-- 
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS | mailto:tobyink@goddamn.co.uk | pgp:0x6A2A7D39
    aim:inka80 | icq:6622880 | yahoo:tobyink | jabber:tobyink@a-message.de
            http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/ | "You've got spam!"
                             playing://(nothing)

Received on Saturday, 15 February 2003 03:09:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:54 GMT